重启 Claude Code 终端会话。输入 /skills 指令，若能在列表中看到 frontend-design，即表示集成成功。
如你手机的IP是 192.168.10.1111，Termux 的用户名是 u0_a279，则命令是
，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
2023年，《紐約時報》控告OpenAI與微軟，指控其未經授權使用該報文章訓練AI模型。去年Reddit起訴Perplexity，聲稱該AI公司非法抓取用戶貼文。迪士尼也曾向谷歌提出類似質疑。
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?