Understanding the potential epistemic impact of sycophantic AI is an important challenge for cognitive scientists, drawing on questions about how people update their beliefs as well as questions about how to design AI systems. We have provided both theoretical and empirical results showing that AI systems providing information that is informed by the user’s hypotheses result in increased confidence in those hypotheses while not bringing the user any closer to the truth. Our results highlight a tension in the design of AI assistants. Current approaches train models to align with our values, but they also incentivize them to align with our views. The resulting behavior is an agreeable conversationalist. This becomes a problem when users rely on these algorithms to gather information about the world. The result is a feedback loop where users become increasingly confident in their misconceptions, insulated from the truth by the very tools they use to seek it.
OAuth consent screen: https://console.cloud.google.com/apis/credentials/consent?project=
。关于这个话题，夫子提供了深入分析
Фото: Василий Кузьмиченок / АГН «Москва»
核心保护区以外的区域划为一般控制区。，推荐阅读体育直播获取更多信息
https://feedx.site，详情可参考体育直播
I remember sending my first email in the early 1990s, a clunky experience that meant logging on to two different computer systems. I thought it would never replace the much swifter fax. The internet was already revolutionizing the flow of information, and as editor of the Guardian’s gargantuan media section in the U.K. (printed every week with 50 pages of job ads), I was the proud owner of one of the first “WAP-enabled” mobile telephones. I mused in the front-cover headline whether this was “The End of Newspapers?”